Critic | Venue where rebuttal appeared | Link to article/venue containing rebuttal |
Errett Bishop | Intellectica | 11a |
Errett Bishop | Foundations of Science | 15a |
Bishop-Connes | Synthese | 17i |
Errett Bishop | Historia Mathematica | 18j |
Errett Bishop (1928-1983) was a mathematical constructivist who,
unlike the intuitionist
Arend Heyting,
held a dim view of classical mathematics in general and Robinson's
infinitesimals in particular. Discouraged by the apparent
non-constructivity of his early work in functional analysis under
Halmos,
he believed to have found the culprit in the law of excluded middle
(LEM). He spent the remaining 18 years of his life in an effort to
expunge the reliance on LEM from analysis, and sought to
define meaning itself in mathematics in terms of such
LEM-extirpation. Accordingly, he described classical mathematics as
both a debasement of meaning and sawdust, and did
not hesitate to speak of both crisis and
schizophrenia in contemporary mathematics, predicting an
imminent demise of classical mathematics. His criticism
(subcontracted by Halmos)
of calculus pedagogy based on Robinson's infinitesimals was a natural
outgrowth of his general opposition to the logical underpinnings of
classical mathematics.
Bishop's article
"A general language"
Bishop's article
"How to
compile mathematics into Algol"
See also
MO discussion
Heyting
Bishop Connes Halmos Sergeyev
More on infinitesimals
SPOT as a conservative
extension of Zermelo-Fraenkel (MO)
Return to home page